Note that this single instance is an off-hand reference to GWBush in an obscure stream of comments about John Kerry.
Here's the short explanation of the Dilbert Principle and the Peter Principle from which it was derived.
| In Nutshells | |
| The Peter Principle | The Dilbert Principle |
| Managers move up in any hierarchy until reaching their level of incompetence. | Managers are placed at their level of incompetence having no inkling of what is competent whatsoever. |
Haven't we all been been insulted enough by mainstream journalists who have not uncovered regarding President Obama:
- A single transcript from any institution of learning regarding BHO.
- A single paper written by BHO while editor of the Harvard Law Review.
- Hell -- A single graded paper of BHO from any level of school.
- Who helped BHO write two best-selling books prior to his elevation to the national spotlight.
- Who prepaid for the early copies of his first book so that it became a best-seller before anybody ever heard of BHO.
And this lack of investigation comes to you from the same "impressive" sources, the majority of whom still think that Dan Rather's falsification of a GWBush ANG evaluation was fake but accurate.
I know why you can't find -- until today -- any reference to Barack Obama as the Dilbert Principle President. It is because the whole circling-down-the-drain country is so Politically
WTF have you done before you were elected President that was of any significance, you goddamn puppet of God-knows-who special interests?
I'm so disgusted with the lack of candor on this subject that I'm strongly considering revising my new definition of PC from Politically Cowered to Political Cowards.
View My Stats
lol. Nice!!
ReplyDeleteFantastic post. Only the left could possess the stark shameless hypocrisy to so desperately protect Barry from every criticism they leveled at George Bush. They do not have a milligram of scruples.
ReplyDeleteThanks Og & Red. The media play the tune chosen by those whom pay them, not by those who have the effluent inflicted upon them.
ReplyDeleteNever forget that the Statists are entrenched at the top of corporate giants like GE, MS, an Dupont, and at the top of govt protected, self-sustaining entities like public employees' unions.
Oh how I wish I could pass along all the comments I hear regularly out of the mouths of proto-zombies I dare speak with. The downside of my telling you all that I hear is that the sources would dry up.
So you'll have to be content with the fact that they propel me to write more of how unbelievably dense they are, and all the more evil because they choose to remain self-servingly, unreachably dense.
" That's because you've been insulted enough by mainstream journalists who have not uncovered regarding President Obama:
ReplyDeleteA single transcript from any institution of learning regarding BHO.
A single paper written by BHO while editor of the Harvard Law Review.
Hell -- A single graded paper of BHO from any level of school. "
It is ostensible that Obama got his various boyfriend and girlfriends to write his termpapers for him, just as Ayers was the real author his two books From all that I can gather, he is a near illiterate.
Political parties aside for the moment, when was the last time we had a sitting President who was little more than a figure head.
ReplyDeleteAnd at what point in time could this be considered to have become the rule and not the exception?
I would say Reagan was the last one of any real individual merit, substance, or public demonstrable leadership ability.
Go back earlier then that; perhaps Truman. Before that no one particular President comes to mind after Lincoln (and depending on how you view his reaction to Southern secession, even he is up for debate)
This is not to be viewed as making excuses for Obama in any way shape or form. Rather, it shows he is but the worst of many!
Guy,
ReplyDeleteYou make a good point. Still you too admit that the current marionette has, far and away, the lightest resumé of any candidate for the oval office we have yet seen.
The American people have to be somewhat responsible for it allowing itself to be misled or forced into silence about the conspiracy of propaganda.
Oh don't get me wrong, all I was trying to say was, that although he may be the worst, he is not the first. As far as the voting public go, you are correct in holding them accountable for all the poor choices; not only in the oval office, but in both houses of congress as well. I would also add the media (print, tv, and to some extent radio) are also somewhat responsible, in they are so biased across the board, you have to really dig sometimes to get even close to something resembling the truth.
ReplyDelete