Kubrick Fans: Steering AI With Personal Knowledge

When using AI, it helps to have some knowledge on any subject searched. In that way when AI seems to avoid some answers one can redirect. Even after getting better results, it can be both humorous and annoying how often it insists on including results that satisfy a Woke agenda.

I will demonstrate with one of my favorite conclusions about the what drives the plots in all of Stanley Kubrick's major, prescient films: Societal Corruption. Kubrick Fans may enjoy the irony of using his work to investigate the vagary of AI dependability.  

First, this is how I best summarize that corruption in major films. 

1. Paths of Glory: WWI generals.
2. Lolita: intellectuals attracted to innocents (pedophilia.)
   
3. Spartacus: insatiable appetites and hubris of the super wealthy.
4. Dr Strangelove: Tragicomedy of shortsightedness by "brilliant" minds.
5. 2001: AI itself corrupted by its programming. Danger from limited agenda sharing.
6. Clockwork Orange: Ruling class fostering and exploitation of criminal activity.
7. Barry Lyndon: The fish rots from the head down.
8. The Shining: Examining sinister forces that appear as opulence decays.
9. Full Metal Jacket: Consequences of abuse and of wars with hidden agendas.
10. Eyes Wide Shut: Exposing the existence of an Epstein client type elite. Pedophilia subplot.
11. AI (as planned): Pretty sure what Spielberg produced missed Kubrick's intent.

My first search was "itemize societal corruption depicted by Kubrick."

This resulted in a very narrow 4 film result displaying only 4 small windows that looked like icons used for hot links. But they only displayed one-liners when passing the cursor over them. Very odd.

So I tried again, same search terms. This time I got, at length, 3 film results of Nos. 1, 6, & 10.

I resubmitted identically again, and got 5 lengthy film results (4,6,7,9 &10). What's noticeable is how the first lengthy result gives details about "Eyes" that are far more ominous than does the second.

 

"Eyes" #1 belongs in the Epstein List category

Elite Society Secrets and Debauchery: In “Eyes Wide Shut” (1999), Kubrick explores the hidden lives of wealthy and powerful individuals, revealing a world of secrecy, manipulation, and exploitation. The film hints at the existence of secret societies and the corrupt practices within them.

 

"Eyes #2 belongs in a category more fitting the film "Lolita."

Corruption of Education and Intellectualism: In "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999), the theme of corruption in academia is hinted at through the character of Dr. Edward Mendak, a seemingly respectable and esteemed professor who is revealed to have a dark secret, highlighting the potential for corruption within institutions of higher learning.

 

One may find it worth noting that it takes quite a bit more to get AI to consider the pedophilia displayed in the two scenes featuring actress LeeLee Sobieski . At the time of filming her preteen character she was 16. Once I got it to acknowledge her scenes, AI's conclusion provides enough equivocation to placate the Woke movement. 

 

Leelee Sobieski’s appearance in Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut serves as a testament to the film’s thought-provoking and visually striking portrayal of human corruption. Her character’s involvement in the sex party scene adds complexity to the narrative, inviting viewers to contemplate the blurred lines between consent and coercion, as well as the darker aspects of human nature.

 

In the interest of keeping from getting much longer, I will mention that there were many considerable AI flaws revealed, some more fishy than others. For instance, to "Kubrick's Portrayals were inspired by what events," one result included in its list was:

Kubrick’s use of irony and satire in his films, such as Dr. Strangelove and A Clockwork Orange (1971), may have been inspired by the Watergate scandal, which exposed political corruption and abuse of power in the United States during the 1970s.

The readily visible flaw here is the anachronism.

There were other anachronisms, and even though both those films respectively preceded Watergate by 8 & 1 years, this may not have been the worst. I featured this flaw because when AI omitted (1964) after Strangelove but included (1971) after Orange, that seems deliberately disingenuousness to fit its 1970s assertion. How does one program for that? Maybe the answer is less direct. It could be by Planting a seed so as to seek ways to include Watergate when mentioning political corruption of any kind likely plays a role in any left leaning AI.

I invite the reader to try to get any AI to give you a intriguing set of answers to the following inquiry. You may or may not get the same results each time (or that I did) without extra thought.

Itemize societal corruption depicted by Kubrick, Paths, Lolita, strangelove, 2001, Clockwork, Lyndon, shining, metal jacket, Spartacus, Eyes, AI

I found that I really needed to list partial titles to get AI to consider all of them (most of the time.) I find the results are all useful even as they are frequently evasive. I did learn a bit more about a subject of which I was already quite knowledgeable.

Exposing More Climatism Lies

Today Los Angeles experienced a weather anomaly worth mentioning here because it and the consequences of it will be downplayed and lied about by our Soviet-Style Media.

Due to a tropical storm down in Baja California (this is Mexico's rainy season) and helpful low pressure region north of us plus some favorable current, we Angelenos got quite a lot of rain today IN THE MIDDLE OF JULY.

In my over forty years in California, I can attest that such is a very rare event indeed.


Now get this. I recently purchasing two 60 gallon rain barrels. I've hooked them up to my gutters' downspouts. Additionally I have another 60 gallon water collection barrel and an old 35 gallon plastic garbage barrel. I use both of these as a spare to catch overflow from each of the rain barrels.
Furthermore, I have a green 105 gallon garbage barrel that is provided by the city for the collection of garden waste that I rarely have need for because I compost my grass and fallen leaves. I need to put out trimmed branches maybe once every two months.

In what has been scattered showers throughout the day, I have filled both rain barrels and the green garbage barrel to capacity. Furthermore, the 35 gallon and 60 gallon barrels are about 20% filled. We are supposed to get some more rain tonight, and again on Monday (I don't know why Sunday is a day off), so I imagine they will be filled too before this is over.

That's 225+ gallons of rain water in one day. Mind you, none of these showers we had today were the really terrible downpours that have been legendary out here. The 120 gallons barrels filled themselves. I manually collected water from a puddles and that was how I filled the 105 gallon green barrel. 

The point I wish to make is that California does not have a drought problem; it has a water storage problem. That lack of storage is due in part by law passed by a humanity-hating governor and state legislature. But even before that, the destruction of our water storage capacity was by court order due to humanity hating watermelon lawsuits funded by misanthropic non-profit foundations and your tax dollars. 

By non-democratic procedures we have had our water storage capacity diminished.

And as you are coming to recognize about nearly everything that is being declared "legal," perversion is now 9/10 of the Law.

Silence Often Viewed As Consent

The SSM has not taken notice of Mr. Obama's rare silence on anything on matters such as this headline.

FBI: Law Enforcement Officers Feloniously Killed in Line of Duty Up 89% in 2014

Because the highly paid apparatchiks occupying our news institutions haven't mentioned it, someone ought comment that silence is often viewed as consent.

Envy As Admitted Federal Policy

Unbelieveably, the essence of Marxist class warfare, envy and its exploitation, was admitted today by "one of the prime architects of both the Massachusetts healthcare reform and the Affordable Care Act, Professor of economics at MIT, Jonathon Gruber." [source]

"That means that the genetic winners, the lottery winners who've been paying an artificially low price because of this discrimination now will have to pay more in return."

Sickening. Coveting the health of your neighbor is now fair game in contemporary America. Essentially this: 'If you are healthy, you deserve to be handicapped, and we have the power to do it to you.' You first Dr. Gruber.

Incidental report from the street:
I hear from soft-headed liberals who have been repeating the nonsense that gets aired repeatedly on SSM TV such as MSNBC declare that conservatives are anti-American because they disagree with President Obama. This revelation will not faze them in the least.

The real problem:
What is more of a problem are the conservative talkshow hosts who refuse to call this president a Marxist. And you know the old Leftist slogan -- "no enemies on the left." That would explain a great deal why talkers like Michael Medved and others at Salem broadcasting regularly call out others on the Right as traitors to the GOP before they'll call out Leftists as traitors to America. Or traitors to common decency. Or traitors to JudeoChristian ethics (thou shall not covet) such as this genius Gruber.

One Solution:
We of the TEA Party movement need to disassociate ourselves from the "Rightists" on the Marxist political spectrum of Left and Right. Let me repeat Ronald Reagan's vision for you. 

There is no such thing as a left or right. There's only an up or down: up to man's ages-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.

I am not on the Right any longer. There are too many Downs over there. I'm with the Ups.

To Hell with Downs like Medved, Hewitt, Prager, and anyone else who thinks like them. They are unfit company for people who need to recognize and fight all the enemies of freedom.

The Whole > Sum of All Corruptions

 

Heaven: We have a problem. The corruption is feeding itself.

Let us look at three relatively small items making news today alone, providing us evidence of much much more going on than is good for a healthy republic.

Item 1:
At the Politico column with the name “Behind the Curtain” no less,we have The New Power Triangle from which we find the following money quote.

“We have been looking literally for years for someone we can cut deals with, and finally someone has stepped up,” a White House official said. West Wing aides say they now talk with McCain roughly every other day.

This is nearly admitting to the American equivalent of the 1st Triumvirate of ancient Rome. Well, at least Crassus, Pompey and Caesar appeared on the same stage as equals. Here is our version:

I know that after this photo, there can hardly be anything worse from McCain. However, I see worse yet in this item from the Politico.

It has the audacity to label it The "NEW" power triangle? New? How about McCraven and Bummer talking since the summer of 2008, where, in the alleged heat of the campaign for the most powerful position in the world, the former declared the latter "a nice man?"

Item 2:
Selwyn Duke in Total Recall: Why Recall Elections are a Must, sees the solution to the unresponsiveness of our pols as one where if only those serving us were subject to recall elections. He concludes his analysis with:

"If politicians knew that breaking an election promise or stabbing good Americans in the back would result in an immediate recall effort, they’d be more likely to mind their p’s and q’s. "

Among other things I left in my comment (including a sample proof of his wrong assessment of our current electoral process) -- to which he has not replied -- is that his solution might have worked in another day when the voting rolls had not been compromised and the numbers who get their funds for existence from gub handouts had not been super-expanded by the community organizer.

Item 3:
From Reason: Cop Fired for Speaking Out Against Ticket and Arrest Quotas.

After the arrival of a new police chief in 2010, the department entered an era of ticket quotas and worse.

“When I first heard about the quotas I was appalled,” says former Auburn police officer Justin Hanners, who claims he and other cops were given directives to hassle, ticket, or arrest specific numbers of residents per shift. “I got into law enforcement to serve and protect, not be a bully.”

Hanners blew the whistle on the department’s tactics and was eventually fired for refusing to comply and keep quiet.

Maybe you think we should wait for the locals to run the police chief out of town on a rail. However, we learn that he retired (claiming medical reasons). So who hired this man? And who looked the other way as the scheme -- undoubtedly seen as a "revenue enhancer" rather than as a public safety measure -- was rammed through? Indeed, in case you think I'm alone in my conclusions below, we have this quote.

“You have a policy that encourages police to create petty crimes and ignore serious crimes, and that’s clearly the opposite of what we want our police to be doing,” [emphasis added]

I added emphasis so as to pin-point the sovietization of small town America. It's the end result of the ends justifies the means mentality of cynical pols: "Everyone is guilty of something, so what's the diff?" That attitude is precisely on the road to what Solzhenitsyn told us of the operations of the Soviet system: They were not interested in the truth. They simply want to arrest us and then not let go.

Conclusion:
When you see little things like this come to the surface, you are pretty damn sure you are witnessing merely the tips of the iceberg. So you know the sum of what you do see is surely far less than the whole. Furthermore, Item 3 provides yet another example of why Gresham's Law Applies to American Institutions. The bad elements fired the good. And on it goes unless we speak up.

I urge you dear readers to discuss these developments locally. Take note on your own of the various tips of the icebergs that you see. Not just for your own sake, but for what this Nation was meant to represent and the opportunities it was meant to provide.

Help preserve what's left.

Help restore what's lost.

He will ask you what you did not try to do. I don't know about you, but I keep looking for whatever I may have overlooked.