I would like more people to be mulling this surmise:
The agenda here is Global Governance. Anyone who missed Cameron's speech in Parliament really missed something. He was talking about hauling Qadaffi before the International Criminal Court to be charged with "crimes against humanity."
Where? Inside Libya. Was that an INTERNATIONAL crime? Uh, no.
Hence, these creeps are using common antipathy for a creep like Qadaffi in order to establish a precedent giving the ICC jurisdiction within sovereign nations.
I call that a bad idea. Qadaffi is playing the part for all it's worth. -- Carryokie at FR [emphasis in original]
Notice the global machinations here, the profound vacillations, the delays that guaranteed the loss of civilian lives (like sacrificial lambs). It all stinks to high heaven. Let the direction of that stench suggest where to find solutions.
View My Stats
I started to write a comment here, and it rapidly became a post of its own. So I trackedback to your post.
ReplyDeleteWhat I want to know is who let the kid in the oval office have access to matches and flammable fluids. Things are getting messier and messier here and abroad.
Keep your powder dry.
"who let the kid in the oval office have access to matches and flammable fluids. "
ReplyDeleteThe shadow oligarchs. According to Plato, we would only be permitted to see the shadows they cast.
I will admit to a belief in there being (at least in some cases) "a power(s) behind the throne". And there is evidence to this being the case in many past civilizations/empires. But I still have a hard time buying into there being a consistant conspirital effort (in the shadows, if you will) directing what has been going on and what may be going on in our future.
ReplyDelete"Why?", you may ask. Because for such a thing to take place, across generations, and involving any number of individuals to keep it going, and keep it secret would be bending the limits of human nature to such a degree as to be neigh impossible.