"What humanitarian mission opens sea lanes to terrorists, to Hamas?It's in the spirit of the Tea Party not only to lay out how bad these "peace" activists behaved, but how bad the Left behaves in general.
What peace activists lynch Israeli soldiers?
What humanitarian mission refuses to cooperate with lawful authorities?
What peace activists chant about Mohamed's massacre of a Jewish tribe?
The Gaza flotilla was not about peace, it was about war."
DeVore is no shrinking violet.
The country needs more like him, especially in the US Senate.
Chuck DeVore at the Israel Solidarity Rally in LA! from Joshua S Trevino on Vimeo.
View My Stats
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteLeave out the gutter language, and I'll be happy to let you make whatever goading remark, however inane, you wish.
ReplyDelete"gutter language"? oxymoron? wow.
ReplyDeleteBut how can cons love of money and love of God coexist?
Luke 16:13 (NIV) "No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money."
Heb 13:5 (RSV) "Keep your life free from the love of money, and be content with what you have."
Many many others.
Ok Pasc won't bite on the above how bout this one.
ReplyDeleteCons, kids cost on average around 13k per year per kid for school. Then add on health care, lost government tax revenue and we are up to what, 16k per year per kid? The poor and most of the middle class will never end up paying for their own kids. Why not offer free abortion and free birth control? Seems like a bargain. Or why do people without kids end up paying for people with kids?
It's not love of money for the Right, but protection of property.
ReplyDeleteOn the Left, with its stirring of envy, that LOVES money. Dis I say love? The Left LUSTS after other people's money.
As far as public schools. You, who have no children, are rightfully miffed.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to end school taxation, I have always been on your side. Where do we differ here?
"If you want to end school taxation, I have always been on your side. Where do we differ here? "
ReplyDeleteI guess 95 percent of families can't pay for their own kids. Why do you cons make it so hard to receive abortions and birth control? Shouldn't we just make abortions and birth control free?
You guess?
ReplyDeleteDamn peculiar! Why is promoting abortion so important to you Rep.?
"The Left LUSTS after other people's money. "
ReplyDeleteHow about the rights love of the military and love of the police? I can take care of myself, why should I have to pay for your giant military and pay police to protect me from drugs (75 percent ? of polices work)? If you got rid of most of the military and half the police and made drugs legal we would all be a lot better off.
"Damn peculiar! Why is promoting abortion so important to you Rep.? "
ReplyDeleteEconomic common sense. The people who can least afford kids are the ones having the most kids.
Is abortion murder Pasc?
ReplyDeleteRep: Is abortion murder?
ReplyDeleteSometimes. Where the Left favors all of it, that position makes them accessory to murder.
Do you favor all of it, Rep?
"Do you favor all of it, Rep? "
ReplyDeleteWhat is all of it? I favor what the law currently allows, whatever that is.
Why not make them free Pasc?
Rep: What is all of it?
ReplyDeleteYour being coy doesn't make you look good Rep.
I'll tell you what Rep. I have more important things to do besides entertain you in this mindless manner.
You obviously take issue with my disgust for the Sus worship as I lay out up front in my synopsis in the sidebar, and as it follows as a theme throughout my work.
Why don't you offer support for Sus worshipers instead of beating around the bush? That should keep you busy for a few days.
I need to get out the vote for DeVore and bunch of other stuff, including the three essays I'm having trouble completing.
So, thanks for your efforts in trying to provoke me and go off and write a good solid defense of your worship of human population reduction.
"Few of us would think it right to inflict severe suffering on an innocent child, even if that were the only way in which we could bring many other children into the world. Yet everyone will suffer to some extent, and if our species continues to reproduce, we can be sure that some future children will suffer severely. Hence continued reproduction will harm some children severely, and benefit none."
ReplyDeleteSounds about right to me
It may not be clear but the above "Sounds about right to me" is a link to an article.
ReplyDeleteThanks Rep. I was aware of Singer's latest effluent. Your ping reminded me and I am commenting on it elsewhere where it may do more good.
ReplyDeleteI honestly wish for you the joy of believing in a better outlook of the future than the pessimism of the Sus worshipers and its high priests like Singer.
"I honestly wish for you the joy of believing in a better outlook of the future"
ReplyDeleteWTF, death is the future. No joy in that, just the same as before you were born. Nothing. Most likely a lot of pain before death, as the right wingers have a fetish about opiates and don't like people to die in peace. The wing-nuts actually seem to have a perverse pleasure in making the chronically ill suffer and condemn those such as Kevorkian that try and limit the pain in the end. We will all (mankind) probably grow up one day.
Singer: “So why don’t we make ourselves the Last Generation on Earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required — we could party our way into extinction!”
ReplyDeleteRep: Sounds about right to me
So, that describes you and your wife Rep? Sterilized and partying your way to extinction.
Typical con analysis and response. Picking at sound bytes and missing the big picture.
ReplyDeleteThe big picture is, it really doesn't matter what we do. In the end, humans are inconsequential. Humans man made God, is the only thing that makes us of any consequence.
In the end we all die and return to the same nether world where we were before being born. To believe anymore than that, with the 0 proof we have, is to live in delusion. And the right has shown a need to wallow in delusion with pretty much everything they say and do.
Rep: Humans man made God, is the only thing that makes us of any consequence.
ReplyDeleteThat in a nutshell is why you hate Christians and Jews Rep. Can't have humans thinking they're any different than cattle when you're sending them off to the ovens.
"Can't have humans thinking they're any different than cattle when you're sending them off to the ovens. "
ReplyDeleteUh, I think that's what your God does (sends people to the ovens (hell)), except your God has humans suffer for eternity. Nice guy.
At least the Nazis killed the Jewish first, with mostly painless gas (30 seconds max of suffering), before burning them (no suffering).
Anyone with common sense would agree that a God that permits eternal suffering in a burning hell, is worse than someone that provides a quick and permanent end.
If you don't understand that life is entirely about pleasure and pain, then I am light years ahead of you.
RayGun: Anyone with common sense would agree that a God that permits eternal suffering in a burning hell, is worse than someone that provides a quick and permanent end.
ReplyDeleteThe usual defense by theologians is that two women sleeping together is so disgusting that being tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb, with the smoke of our torment ascending up for ever and ever and no rest day nor night does not come close to satisfying the infinite justice of a perfect God.
Since you don't believe, why does it matter to you Teresita? If it's true, it simply is, whatever you want to believe. And if not, that's good for you.
ReplyDeleteWhy should what others believe bother you enough that your displeasure has been sited as reason enough in Canada to pass laws against stating it? Some speaker or writer could be shot under color of authority due to that law.
As we see, for Rep that's no loss, and may be a bonus.
How about you?
Rep: WTF, death is the future. No joy in that,
ReplyDeleteMarty at Belmont Club has an answer to Singer that aptly fits your comment Rep.
Marty: The postmodern musings of a fourth-rate mind, played as if they had value.
Unfortunately, some people in govt, academia and medicine (fifth-rate minds, I guess) take him seriously, so he is a menace.
People who live lives of misery and pain, destitution and disease, wake up in the morning happy to have another day, determined to make as much of it as they can
Singer, a rich, healthy westerner in Princeton, NJ, wakes up every day and questions whether his life is worth the bother.
Pete, I have your answer: No, it’s not. Now, act on that.
POS
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish." Albert Einstein
ReplyDeleteSounds about right to me.
"Why should what others believe bother you..."
ReplyDeleteBecause people foist their beliefs on others and use that to limit their freedom. Ironic that the right, who claim to love freedom so much, does so much to limit it. And now sweet simple Sarah says American Law Should Be 'Based On The God Of The Bible And The Ten Commandments'. Scary stuff.
Pascal: Why should what others believe bother you enough that your displeasure has been sited as reason enough in Canada to pass laws against stating it? Some speaker or writer could be shot under color of authority due to that law.
ReplyDeleteI'm an American and I live under the first amendment, but such laws as you describe in Canada also hold in Germany, where holocaust denial is forbidden by law. In the States, a group of skinheads could form a church that preaches holocaust denial as doctrine, and there's nothing we can do about it, just as there is nothing we can do about preaching of Leviticus 18 against homosexuality.
Pretty sure Canada does not have laws that Pasc alluded to or that they mean what he implys. Pasc, please enlighten us with a link.
ReplyDeleteIreland is a different story.
Rep:Because people [using people like Singer and Rep] foist their beliefs on others and use that to limit their freedom
ReplyDeleteBioethicist Wesley J. Smith, referring to this article: “This is nihilism on stilts and it is polluting the West’s self confidence and belief in universal human equality like the BP oil well is polluting the Caribbean.
“Only the resulting mess isn’t measured in polluted beaches and dead birds, but existential despair that destroys human lives.”
“Under the influence of anti-human advocates like Peter Singer, we have gone in the West from seeking to ‘secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity,’ to seriously questioning whether there should be any posterity at all.”
I wish man would selectively breed Chimpanzees for 150 years only promoting the brightest of the groups. Much like we do with other animals, dogs for example, for specific purposes or traits, and then observe how intelligent the end result would be.
ReplyDeleteYou really think we are all that much different than animals Pasc?
"The genus Pan is considered to be part of the subfamily Homininae to which humans also belong. These two species are the closest living evolutionary relatives to humans, sharing a common ancestor with humans six million years ago"
And if we can abuse animals, because so called God gave us dominion over them (because we are smarter than them?) then alien beings traveling from far away galaxies should have dominion over humans because of their far greater intellect?