Very few of the Establishment appear to be honest brokers. Hence I understand the short-term allure of the tactics of Donald Trump. But long term? Really?
Please let examples such as the following serve as a warning (one of many I've received, but I'm providing this one as an abject lesson) to those who want to believe that "someone is working for ME." My letter to them [Heritage] could be sent to Trump and a horde of others. I suspect it will be met with deaf ears if it is even read by anyone.
Dear Christie Fogarty (presuming that's your real name), or anyone who cares for the reputation of Heritage,
Re: Christie Fogarty <info@heritage.org>
"Pascal,I just stepped out of our final membership team meeting of the month. I wanted to remind you that you haven't renewed your Heritage membership this year.You’ve been one of our most dedicated members and I know you wouldn’t want your Heritage membership to expire...."
Heaven
forbid that anyone at your institution or others like you would bother
to personalize a fund-raising message at least somewhat.
I do not remember what year it was exactly -- I think 1999 or 2000 -- when I last sent you any money.
First of all, I'd say my membership long ago expired and so it is impossible for me not to want it to expire
now. In fact once was the only time I sent you anything. It was
because I read of an attempt by the Clinton administration to attack you
(I do not recall now the nature of that attack). In retrospect you have
forced me to conclude that it was a weak moment on my part. I find it
painful to recall. Thank you.
And
secondly, but more importantly, since 2000 was the last time I could
have sent you anything, how is it possible that I could now be one of
you most dedicated members? The very essence of what Heritage is supposed to stand for is undermined by such a preposterous designation.
I can hear your best explanation now:
"What we do is so important that we must maintain funding, and past contributors have proven to be future ones, thus we are hoping we can touch you again, so please excuse a little hyperbole."
In other words: "Our ends justify our means."
How
exactly is that not similar in nature to Nancy Pelosi's "Are you
serious? Are you serious?" when asked where in the constitution one
could find permission for Obamacare.
I
am sadly aware how sophistry is a nasty part of our heritage. Given
that the ends justifying the means tactics are being employed by your
fundraisers, it would appear sophistry, or at best its useful idiot tool
casuistry, have become a mainstay at Heritage.
If you retain a vestige of shame you will rectify this behavior immediately.
At
the least one would think that Heritage, which claims to be in the
forefront of protecting individuals from large and remote institutions,
and a institution in its own rite, could respond favorably to an
individual who has caught you employing tactics apparently learned from
those you want us to believe you are protecting us. Et tu Heritage?
Your cynicism feeds my skepticism. If your purpose in life is to convince the public that nothing beyond divine intervention can save us, then you are firmly on the road to damnation.
It's like Phishing. One step above cold calls.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how many respond positively.
"someone is working for ME." Strongmen work for themselves.
Maybe they weren't lying, maybe there membership is low, and they set the bar very low for being a 'most dedicated member.'
ReplyDelete"You’ve been one of our most dedicated members and I know you wouldn’t want your Heritage membership to expire...."
Hi Pascal,
ReplyDeletePerhaps Christie Fogarty is actually a boiler room filled with unpaid interns who have never known a world different from the cynical and meaningless one they seem to inhabit. In a paradoxical way, it may be that the letter you received is actually a good representation of the heritage they have been handed.
Alec