Despite the alleged separation of church and state, BELIEF in Sustainability is widely held in American secular government. Judeo-Christian moral guidelines have been incrementally supplanted by what can best be described as neo-pagan ones. Consequently, notice where rulers never utter a harsh word against Malthusian, Utilitarian, Green and Islamistophilic nutcases. There the ruled are at grave risk.
ABC News: "Death Panels (snicker) Will Save Money" -- Paul Krugman of the NYTimes
Well, when ABC News' The Roundtable is willing to discuss this openly, brazenly, even with snickers for those who "bitterly cling" to the "old" JudeoChristian value system (that innocent human life is sacred), well, maybe there are many more who will take my last two posts seriously enough to pass them on to those who still believe "liberal" means behaving decently towards the less fortunate.
Your job, should you dare take up the challenge, is to
Convince all the liberals you know that the Left has taken power in the government under liberal disguise.
The Left is not the same as "liberal."
It is not a good thing as the above video attests despite the attempted white wash of the main speaker.
I began yesterday's observation with the line: They (the "Progressive," self-assessed elitists) keep revealing to you how they think. Don't fear to pass it on. The bloc in power has begun to drop the smiley face.
Build your own blocs while there is still time. With the aid of their Sinister media and its disinformation, the fascists are already beginning to round up existing blocs that are more easily portrayed as extremists. It's a predictable pattern. After starting at the fringes, they eventually can get anyone they fear or even simply suspect. When they decide to come for you, they would like to do it by picking you off one or two at a time before you get suspicious enough to plan. But they're not yet prepared to get you all at once and may never be. If this is really meant to be a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people, then the nation's founders were expecting the people to forbid letting dictators rule them. Those more astute and less talkative are already preparing while they are still able. Join the movement. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
I can't begin to tell you how many people have said to me in the last 6 months, sheepishly, "It's sure looking like there's something more than paranoia in what you've been saying."
They (the "Progressive", self-assessed elitists) keep revealing to you how they think. Pass it on.
How can you not call them out for engaging in death worship when they are seeking a governing system that has a sordid history of killing great numbers of people? Clearly, the most extreme "environmentalists" believe they are doing you a favor by killing your neighbor ("Oops! We were aiming for your neighbor. Sorry.")
File this story under: "While they're killing you, at least they feel good about themselves."
Humans are too stupid to prevent climate change from
radically impacting on our lives over the coming decades. This is the
stark conclusion of James Lovelock, the globally respected environmental
thinker and independent scientist who developed the Gaia theory.
It follows a tumultuous few months in which public opinion on efforts to
tackle climate change has been undermined by events such as the climate
scientists' emails leaked from the University of East Anglia (UEA) and
the failure of the Copenhagen climate summit.
"I don't think we're yet evolved to the point where we're clever enough
to handle a complex a situation as climate change," said Lovelock in his
first in-depth interview since the theft of the UEA emails last
November. "The inertia of humans is so huge that you can't really do
anything meaningful."
One of the main obstructions to meaningful action is "modern democracy",
he added. "Even the best democracies agree that when a major war
approaches, democracy must be put on hold for the time being. I have a
feeling that climate change may be an issue as severe as a war. It may
be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while."
You know what's not like a war which would require some
adjustments to normal democratic practice? Actual war. I certainly
don't endorse repealing the Constitution because of war, but look at the
left's reaction to Gitmo, or the idea of ethnic profiling.
But something like a war, on the other hand, requires that all of
democracy be put "on hold."
When will more American's recognize that ØbamaCare is about zero care? When they or someone they care about is denied life saving treatment? What with Ø's True Believers I've run into over the last 2 years, I'm not so sure, as their blinkered bliss reminds me far too much of the Eloi in H.G. Wells' The Time Machine. (Oh, BTW: did you know that old H.G. heavily believed and promoted population control and eugenics? Even yours truly, being a victim of baby-boomer NYC public education, didn't discover that until only a few years ago).
In reward, this couple may be deported to China – in much the same manner the Lockerbie bomber was sent off to Libya – where they can be lauded as model citizens for their reproductive prudence.