tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8851395.post6411272656034947931..comments2023-09-09T11:56:04.929-07:00Comments on Pascal Fervor: Neverending Ploys for Ending LibertyPascalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00303025432356543062noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8851395.post-46701303933647398502014-09-09T12:17:32.094-07:002014-09-09T12:17:32.094-07:00"And then again, who needs God, if this "..."And then again, who needs God, if this "natural law" will work for us?"<br /><br />Noting Natural Law how natural works is no substitute for G-d. Certainly not in the short run; hence the adage "there's no atheists in fox holes." Lies built upon lies must fall. But before that happens, many individuals will be harmed or killed because of the lies. I, myself an agnostic because I it would be a lie for me to say "I know He is there," fully recognize that I pray for His intercession where evil is too strong for me alone. <br /><br />My point was that nothing the evil ones engage in can last long. That is Natural Law. Individuals seeking out G-d for aid in their suffering under evil (and even from natural events) is precisely why the evil ones can never eradicate Him from the minds of men.Pascalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00303025432356543062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8851395.post-40881848230103589822014-09-08T18:27:32.836-07:002014-09-08T18:27:32.836-07:00I undertand your meaning.
I'm saying that if y...I undertand your meaning.<br />I'm saying that if you can find a substitute for God, why depend on God.<br />Or has the substitute been made God?<br />The AGW reference was confusing but meant to relate to false faith.Ed Bonderenkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03724552853113809036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8851395.post-29112326578703542792014-09-07T19:07:57.074-07:002014-09-07T19:07:57.074-07:00Tsunami was was metaphorical Ed.Tsunami was was metaphorical Ed.Pascalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00303025432356543062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8851395.post-176056279808455412014-09-07T19:06:32.409-07:002014-09-07T19:06:32.409-07:00Think about your question at length Ed. "Who ...Think about your question at length Ed. "Who needs G-d?" Especially when you take this to the next level as I did later today with http://pascalfervor.blogspot.com/2014/09/fighting-growth-of-theocracy-in-america_7.htmlPascalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00303025432356543062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8851395.post-48535474621380849492014-09-07T18:49:48.161-07:002014-09-07T18:49:48.161-07:00That's good advice from Og.
However, if we can...That's good advice from Og.<br />However, if we can rely on "natural law" to create "tsunamis", is that not in the same league as unsubstantiated AGW?<br />And then again, who needs God, if this "natural law" will work for us?Ed Bonderenkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03724552853113809036noreply@blogger.com